Tuesday, 6th January, 2009 RSS Feeds
Add to Google Add to My Yahoo! (requires My Yahoo account). Add to My MSN (requires My MSN account). Add to My AOL (requires My AOL account).

Published: Thursday, 27th November, 2008 11:15

West Fife councillors under fire over opencast no show

By Matt Meade

Comment Bubble Comments (4) Printer Print Article
Image related to story, see caption or article text

COUNCILLORS have been criticised for failing to attend a site visit to help decide on the controversial opencast mine proposals based beside two tiny West Fife villages.

Only Bobby Clelland and Alice McGarry out of a possible 11 councillors turned up for the inspection on Friday morning.

Both admitted to being “disappointed” at the poor attendance, which has angered community councils staunchly opposed to the development beside Upper Kinneddar and Cowstrandburn, between Saline and Oakley.

The pair spent over two hours in and around the area where UK Coal Mining Ltd want to extract 750,000 tonnes of coal on a 32 hectare site north of Blair Farm.

Marion McGaughay, chair of Blairhall Community Council, said, “The councillors have a big responsibility so it’s ridiculous.

“They should have turned out in bigger numbers to support local people.

“The big concern for us is the amount of lorries that will be passing through the village. The amount of traffic could have a very big impact on Blairhall.”

John Crane, vice-chair of Saline and Steelend community council, said they too were “extremely disappointed”.

Following a meeting of the community council on Tuesday night, he added, “We would hope that at the next development committee meeting the councillors will take into account all the objections that have been submitted by the residents of Cowstrandburn, Kinnedder Park and our council.

“Being unaware of the circumstances that prohibited the other councillors from attending we were loath to criticise.”

Members of the South West Fife area committee had decided at their last meeting to make a site visit and ask UK Coal about an alternative route for their coal trucks.

The two tiny communities affected have been backed by the community councils of Blairhall, Steelend and Saline.

Committee member Councillor Bob Eadie admitted the poor turn-out was “very regrettable” but said timetable clashes often prevented councillors from attending.

He said, “Site visits have always been a controversial thing because attendance has always been poor.

"It’s one of those things that everyone’s in favour of at the time, but when a date is decided it’s not going to suit everyone.

“A lot of the public have the perception that we are sitting around drinking tea and that’s certainly not the case.”

He added, “I will listen carefully to Bobby Clelland on the matter as he himself is a former miner and someone who is born and bred in the area.”

Of the nine who missed the visit, two were on holiday, two cited work commitments and three were attending to other council duties. The Press was unable to contact the other two.

Councillor Clelland, whose West Fife and Coastal Villages ward covers the site, said, “I’m familiar with the area but still felt it was necessary given the amount of concern from locals to turn up, meet officials and find out more.”

The main objections to the plans include the impact it will have on nearby Bandrum Nursing Home, which has 200 residents and staff and the health hazards posed by dust and continuous noise.

They are also concerns over the route of heavy vehicles which could affect Blairhall, Saline, Steelend and Oakley.

Councillor Alice McGarry, who is chair of the South West Fife area committee, said, “Given that a lot of councillors wanted more information, it’s quite surprising that only two turned up.”

She said site visits were only necessary if there were issues councillors thought were not clear from the papers and maps shown to them.

“They should be done on a rare occasion and this one was certainly justified,” she said.

“Nobody demurred – everyone seemed to want a site visit. I know some had valid reasons for not turning up, but I don’t know about the rest of them.

“It is rather disappointing. I assume that those who were able to turn up but didn’t must feel they already have enough information on which to base their decision.”

David Anderson

(Unregistered User)

Nov 28 08 13:12

Our Ref: 1476

Use the ref number if you need to report this comment

Thanks to the Dunfermline Press for enlightening us on this appalling situation. The residents of the communities of Cowstrandburn and Kinnedar Park would be happy to meet those councillors and show them around the area before it is turned into a giant hole in the ground like many other parts of our county.

Report this comment

anne melrose

(Unregistered User)

Nov 28 08 18:14

Our Ref: 1487

Use the ref number if you need to report this comment

I am shocked that there was such a small turn out for something which has many valid objections and I would be concerned about decisions made on the small representation that was available on this visit. I believe that a further visit should be made before a fair decision can be made - with a higher representation of councillors to discuss the problems that this opencast development presents.

Report this comment

Johan Hardy

(Unregistered User)

Nov 29 08 12:47

Our Ref: 1493

Use the ref number if you need to report this comment

I feel sorry for the residents of these villages. We recently had a large opencast mine imposed on our village even although most people were against it. I sometimes wonder who some of our councillors are really working for.

Report this comment

Jim White

(Unregistered User)

Dec 1 08 05:22

Our Ref: 1504

Use the ref number if you need to report this comment

It appears that no longer does the representatives of the people control what can and what cannot happen.

Each and every time one of these open caste projects comes to the attention of the public guess who loses.

Case in point Crossgates village on the outskirts of Dunfermline fought this battle, fist time around they won and permission was refused, approximately a year later up it comes again on appeal. This time around the public lost and another huge open caste is now in progress. Once the owners of the project obtain their goals, then the surrounding district suffers for at least five years, all the safety hazards, road hazards, dust and noise in conjunction with the emission of filthy water which is removed from the site must now be treated in surface pools which causes insect problems due to the fact this water must lie in reed beds for a length of time before it can be drained off into the ocean.. After the projects closes down all those involved move out back to where they came from and the locals have to continue with what ever conditions they are left with.

Report this comment

comments Comments

Post a comment

Your Name: * Note this is a Required Field *

Your Email: * Note this is a Required Field *

Your Comment:


Characters Left:

Word verification:

Captcha Image, filename 0598652.jpg

For your convenience, you can now register with our website (which will save you from having to retype your name each time you post a comment). If you would like to do this (or have already!) then please Log in or Register

Press Advertisement

Deals

Most Read