Thursday, 4th December, 2008 RSS Feeds
Add to Google Add to My Yahoo! (requires My Yahoo account). Add to My MSN (requires My MSN account). Add to My AOL (requires My AOL account).

On sale for 2009

Published: Wednesday, 11th June, 2008 12:30

Cool councillor gets a bee in his bonnet

By Observer

Comment Bubble Comments (1) Printer Print Article
Image related to story, see caption or article text

DUNFERMLINE councillor Willie Sullivan said something interesting recently, which is a bit odd for a politician.

The Labour man – known among some circles as a ‘cool councillor’ for his (relative) youth and sharp dress sense – has a bee in his bonnet about housing.

So much so, in fact, that he is opposing the building of any more new houses in Dunfermline’s eastern expansion (DEX).

He even went as far as saying that DEX was more a part of Edinburgh than our very own Bridie City on account of all the commuters.

Said Cool Willie, “The planning system seems to be development led. My overall concern is that it doesn’t seem to be about creating communities.

“It’s about making money and developing for the sake of development.”

The issue of housing is, rightfully, an important one. We all need a home, yet sadly we don’t all have one.

The communists of soviet Russia considered housing a necessity and built massive concrete blocks with each home distributed equal to need.

If you think some of our high-rise schemes are bad, take a look at Moscow’s – a true definition of concrete jungle.

But are its bland, almost scary, grey housing ‘units’ really any worse than in this country?

We allocate housing on who has the most money. If you find yourself down on your luck, for whatever reason, you are at the mercy of the state.

And often this means being stuck in a moldy, leaky and asbestos-ridden flat with junkies shooting up outside your door.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the tracks, developers are throwing up five-bedroom houses on any green space the council can’t afford to look after anymore.

The government agency Communities Scotland was set up with purpose of fostering vibrant communities through the provision of affordable homes.

Nice homes, reckons the Government, equals nice people. And nice people equals nice communities.

In theory, this sounds great. But, in practice, where is it?

Barely a single big development is built these days without a certain number of "affordable homes" being allocated.

Consider though, how many people are living in ridiculously bad council housing and try to match them up with new affordable homes being built.

Since each new project only has a small amount of them going, this means a lot more five-bedroom houses costing £500,000 plus are being built.

Added to that, for many people, affordable housing isn’t actually affordable.

When the Government says it wants affordable homes built it means homes available to graduates in their 20s who can only muster a few grand deposit.

A two-bedroom house going for just under £100,000 is considered affordable in this society.

For the single unemployed mother living in one of the council’s neglected housing estates, however, that’s not pocket change.

If affordable housing truly was affordable it would be open to all, rather than those who are lucky enough to have a good job.

We do already have shared ownership and other similar schemes but there is nowhere near enough being done to help people onto the property ladder.

Instead, it seems a growing proportion of folk are being forced into council houses that we wouldn’t expect our prisoners to live in.

So who’s to blame, or to be a bit more constructive, who can help?

Some may say the planners are the baddies in all this by allowing too many developments. Indeed, blaming planning officers would be the easy way out.

But the planners are only doing their job, they must judge applications according to the law and not what they think is best for the area.

In truth, it is an issue we must trust to our politicians (oh dear!).

While we have already seen an indication that the Government wants to move towards change, with the creation of Communities Scotland, there is a lot more to do.

Token gestures – such as reducing stamp duty – really don’t make much difference in the grand scheme of things.

It may sound cliche but housing really can be a powerful tool for creating a happy and healthy country.

All we need to do first, is get our priorities right.

ddempsey

Sep 15 08 17:16

Our Ref: 897

Use the ref number if you need to report this comment

Willie Sullivan may get his wish for no more houses in DEX. Builders build to sell so if no-one's buying …

And if DEX is more a part of Edinburgh, isn't that because Fife doesn't have the right jobs? Who in their right mind would commute across the Forth for the fun of it?

Is the planning system development led because development is seen as the source of infrastructure funds. We end up in a vicious circle; housing pays for infrastructure which makes housing unaffordable; to put it another way, housing costs go up so that householders can't afford to pay for the infrastructure by any other route.

Observer's right to say that state control isn't the answer. The Soviets proved that. That means that housing will continue to be allocated by who has the most money. But that shouldn't mean being at the mercy of the state, at least not for so many. The key is competition and choice, the very antithesis of state provision.

We need to return to the idea of a house as something to live in rather than a device for increasing wealth. To do that, we need to persuade those with spare cash - and a great many very ordinary folk have spare cash - that they can do better than use it to bid up house prices.

If developers are throwing up five-bedroom houses then it's because the punters are (or were) buying them.

As with so much, much blame lies with the Brown government. Time was when spare cash went into saving for a pension. Then GB decided to tax pension funds so folk stopped contributing to them. Now the only safe pensions are provided by the state.

So

1)create a more attractive home for spare wealth

2)create competition to provide homes for all

3)educate kids to the idea that they get themselves a home and they keep it in good order

4)don't lose sight of the safety net for those who, for whatever reason, need help but don't promote that as the route of choice

Report this comment

comments Comments

Post a comment

Your Name: * Note this is a Required Field *

Your Email: * Note this is a Required Field *

Your Comment:


Characters Left:

Word verification:

Captcha Image, filename 0493956.jpg

For your convenience, you can now register with our website (which will save you from having to retype your name each time you post a comment). If you would like to do this (or have already!) then please Log in or Register

Press Advertisement

Deals

Most Read