UP to £50 million is reportedly set to be wiped off Rangers' tax bill after HM Revenue & Customs admitted it had claimed for too much.
According to a report in the Times newspaper, a mistake by the taxman is now being blamed for the Ibrox club's financial meltdown.
The newspaper says it is now believed that the outstanding bill for using an offshore trust to pay Rangers players and staff is likely to be £20m.
READ MORE: Rangers company once owned by Craig Whyte awarded legal costs
The tax avoidance scheme, known as employee benefit trusts (EBTs), was in place from 2001 to 2010.
Former Rangers chairman John McClelland said confusion over the club's tax burden had deterred potential investors when the club was put up for sale in 2011, and ultimately culminated in the operating company's collapse under controversial businessman Craig Whyte - who had bought it in may 2011 for £1.
Rangers went into administration in February 2012 over outstanding PAYE and national insurance payments, and subsequently entered liquidation in June 2012.
At the time, HMRC claimed it was owed more than £90m.
It has now dropped a penalty charge worth £24m and acknowledged an overstatement in other parts of its claim which could reduce total liability to just £20m, reports the Times.
READ MORE: Ex-Rangers chief Charles Green sues police and prosecutors
Mr McClelland said it would have been much easier to find a credible buyer if a tax bill of £20m had been agreed during his tenure.
He said: "At the time of the sale of the club in 2011, had the tax claim been at the level now being reported then, in my opinion, the outcome would have been different. I believe there would certainly have been a much higher level of interest in acquiring it and therefore more potential buyers.
The Times reports that the tax authorities pursued the former Rangers operating company tax liability for the main EBT as a gross figure rather than for only the tax that should have been paid on it.
If HMRC had only sought the net figure, the final bill would fall to around £20m, it reports.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel